ScrepyDocs

Second Page Keywords

Learn how to analyze queries ranking in positions 11–20 and choose between on-page improvement, internal links, consolidation, or new content.

Second Page Keywords shows queries with an average position from 11 through 20, ordered by stronger impression volume. These queries are visible enough to demonstrate relevance but often receive limited clicks.

The phrase “second page” is a prioritization shorthand, not a promise of easy growth. Search results vary by device, location, query, and result format, and many interfaces no longer behave like ten fixed blue links per page.

Read the fields

FieldWhat it contributes
QueryThe exact search need to investigate
PageThe URL currently associated with that query
ImpressionsEvidence that the site appears for the demand
Clicks / CTRWhether the current visibility already produces traffic
PositionAverage strength of visibility across included impressions

Prioritize with more than impressions. A query's commercial relevance, page fit, competition, and realistic ability to improve matter just as much.

Classify the constraint

The right page, incomplete answer

The URL matches the intent but misses important subquestions, evidence, examples, or decision support. Improve usefulness and clarity without padding the page.

The right page, weak internal support

The page is relevant but buried in the architecture. Add contextual links from related authoritative pages and confirm the target is canonical and crawlable.

The wrong page ranks

Another URL should own the query. Investigate page overlap, internal anchors, titles, and canonicals. Use the cannibalization workflow before creating or removing content.

The query needs a distinct page

The ranking page only touches the topic and cannot fully satisfy the intent without losing focus. Validate a new-content opportunity.

The competition or result format is different

The query may favor a tool, category, video, local result, forum, or highly authoritative source. Decide whether the site can offer the expected format and unique value.

Analyze step by step

  1. Group variations that share the same intent.
  2. Open the ranking page and state its primary purpose in one sentence.
  3. Compare that purpose with the query's likely task.
  4. Review current top results for format and user expectations.
  5. Inspect the page's internal links, canonical, indexability, and content completeness.
  6. Estimate business value and achievable impact.
  7. Select one strategy: improve, link, consolidate, differentiate, create, or ignore.

Example

A pricing guide ranks at position 14 for “SEO tool pricing comparison.” The page lists only one product's plans. The query expects a comparison, so adding a few keyword mentions will not close the intent gap. The team should either transform the page into a credible comparison or create a separate comparison page if the existing URL must remain a single-product pricing guide.

Common mistakes

  • Treating every position 11–20 query as low-hanging fruit.
  • Adding unrelated sections to one page to target every nearby keyword.
  • Ignoring the currently ranking URL.
  • Measuring only rank while clicks and qualified traffic remain unchanged.
  • Comparing a short current period with a longer previous period.
  • Assuming more words create more relevance.

Verify the decision

Record the target query cluster, chosen page, baseline impressions, clicks, CTR, and position. After implementation, check whether the intended URL gains the intended queries. A position improvement accompanied by lost query breadth may not be a net win; review page-level and query-level performance together.

On this page