Select your project or an added competitor to group available backlinks by source website. Compare referring and main domain totals, backlink and referring-page counts, nofollow pages, rank and spam context, broken links, first-seen dates, and active or lost status—then open the exact links behind a domain.
See which websites supply your recorded backlinks. Select a target, load its sources and establish the profile-level baseline before judging individual domains.
Link volume and source-page coverage answer different questions. Read them together to distinguish one placement from a website supplying many recorded references.
Sort around one investigation: source concentration, broken targets or newly discovered sources. Use comparative metrics to choose where to look, then inspect the evidence.
example.orgnofollow
Open a source's backlink count to move from a domain summary to recorded placements. Keep the referring page, anchor and destination together when assessing the relationship.
/shop/linen
Domain loss and a broken destination describe different problems. Use dates and counts to locate an investigation, then check which recorded relationship actually changed.
Source/guides
/old-pricing404/setup503Select an already added competitor to investigate its recorded source landscape. Look for relevant publishers and patterns without assuming their links are automatically suitable for your site.
Download a source-domain sheet for review or handoff. Understand its row and field scope before presenting it as a complete backlink inventory.
Move a source to the separate disavow list only after a justified manual review. A domain-wide entry has broader scope than a single source URL.
disavow.txtReviewdomain:example.org
https://example.net/linksBring source-domain evidence into your own reporting or an AI conversation. API and MCP access use an authorized project and the same project or added-competitor boundaries.
/projectsJSON{
"data": [
{ "domain": "example.com" }
]
}Ask your AI assistant to list referring domains and inspect a source's live backlinks for an eligible project or added competitor. Results and table exports are paginated; lost or broken source-link requests are restricted to your own project.
Choose the target, establish a baseline, sort sources around one question, open the recorded links, and verify the pages that matter before taking action.
Select the project for ongoing review and controlled disavow selection, or an added competitor for source-landscape research.
Start with referring domains, main domains, backlinks, and domain rank so later domain-level findings remain connected to the same target and reporting date.
Sort by source domain, authority, link/page counts, spam, broken backlinks or First Seen. Status is displayed, not sortable.
Click the backlink count to inspect current/live source URLs, anchors, targets, type, status, rank and discovery dates in the paginated dialog.
Check important source and destination pages, document what changed, recover a useful target when appropriate, and use the separate disavow workflow only when evidence and Google guidance justify it.
Group links by source when a competitor comparison, migration issue, publisher review, or repeated-source pattern would be harder to understand one backlink at a time.
Select an added competitor to study available source-domain concentration, link counts, status, and the individual records behind relevant websites without assuming the dataset explains how each link was earned.
Sort sources by broken backlinks, open the affected records, and verify whether an external link points to a changed or unavailable destination before choosing a relevant recovery path.
Group available links by publisher, compare the pages behind each source, and verify the anchors and destinations associated with earned-media or partnership work.
Compare backlink and referring-page counts to distinguish a one-page mention from a source contributing many recorded pages, then inspect the links before deciding whether the pattern matters.
Referring-domain data is an observed, changing view of the web. Screpy helps you prioritize evidence without presenting coverage, scores, counts, or timing labels as complete search-engine truth.
Discovery, recrawl, and host-normalization methods differ between tools. A missing domain does not prove that no live link exists, and a stored record may still need a live source-page check.
More referring domains or more links from one domain do not automatically make a profile stronger. Relevance, placement, editorial context, and destination quality still matter.
Use comparative metrics to prioritize review, not to prove ranking value, a penalty, harmful intent, or the need to disavow a source.
First-seen, active, lost, and broken labels depend on discovery and recrawl timing. Verify important source and destination URLs before assigning a cause or reporting a change.
Group sources when domain-level patterns matter, inspect individual backlinks when the exact placement matters, or manage a carefully justified disavow file for a project you control.
Group available backlinks by source website, compare domain-level metrics, and open the records behind each source.
Review individual source pages, anchors, targets, link attributes, dates, state, and profile movement for a domain.
Organize reviewed URLs or domains for a project you control and export a file only when removal efforts and Google guidance justify it.
Screpy documentation
Follow the Screpy guide to group backlinks by source website, compare domain-level evidence, and open the individual links behind a domain.
Learn the concepts behind this workflow and apply them with practical SEO guidance.
Learn how an SEO report generator turns page checks or connected data into useful reports, with a PDF workflow, worked example, and review checklist.
Read articleImprove content structure with table of contents tips and WordPress plugins that boost readability, navigation, engagement, and SEO performance.
Read articleLearn what an infographic is, why visual data improves communication, and how different infographic types support content, design, and marketing.
Read articleExplore 20 link building strategies, prospect checks, outreach examples, and a worked campaign. Measure useful placements and avoid risky shortcuts.
Read articleUnderstand what the domain-level view measures, why tools disagree, and when a source requires deeper link-level review.
A referring domain is a website that links to another website. One referring domain may provide one backlink or many backlinks from different pages.
Yes. Add the competitor to the active project, then select it to compare its available source-domain profile. Disavow selection remains restricted to a project domain you control.
No. Referring Domains is an analysis workflow. For a project domain you control, selected sources can be reviewed in the separate Disavow Management workflow. Google says most sites do not need the disavow tool and warns that incorrect use can harm search performance.
No. Rank and spam metrics are comparative review signals, not Google verdicts. Examine the actual source pages, anchors, targets, relevance, link pattern, and broader history before making a risk decision.
A backlink is one recorded link from a source page to a target page. A referring domain is the source website that provides one or more backlinks. Screpy groups available backlink records by source domain and lets you open the individual links behind each domain.
No. Domain diversity describes the breadth of recorded sources, not the value of every source. Relevance, placement, editorial context, destination quality, and whether the link is live still require review.
It counts recorded source pages with at least one nofollow link to the target. The same pages may also contain followed links, so subtracting this count from referring pages does not give the number of followed pages. Nofollow alone does not prove poor quality.
A domain is marked lost when a loss date is recorded for its last backlink. The observation may reflect removal of that link or an unavailable source page, including 4xx/5xx responses. Verify the important source and target URLs; the date does not prove the publisher's reason or original deletion time.
No backlink index covers the whole web. Tools discover and revisit pages on different schedules, normalize hosts differently, and may report sampled data. Compare trends inside one consistent dataset and verify important links on the live source page.
